Sold house prices in Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12
Foxholes Road Zed-Index
What is the Zed-Index
£93,960
Turnover: 5.4% What is Turnover?
£93,960
Turnover: 5.4% What is Turnover?
Value change
£1,232 (-1.29%) £1,482 (-1.55%) £4,893 (-4.95%) £10,727 (-10.25%) £7,736 (-7.61%) £19,574 (-17.24%) £13,770 (-12.78%)
from
£1,232 (-1.29%) £1,482 (-1.55%) £4,893 (-4.95%) £10,727 (-10.25%) £7,736 (-7.61%) £19,574 (-17.24%) £13,770 (-12.78%)
from
Incorrect details? Report an error
- List view
- Map view
| Sale date | Address | Price paid |
|---|---|---|
| 11th May 2011 |
93 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£68,000 |
| See current value | ||
| 24th May 2007 |
109 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Freehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£124,950 |
| See current value | ||
| 25th Sep 2006 |
117 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£123,500 |
| See current value | ||
| 22nd Aug 2006 |
85 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£92,000 |
| See current value | ||
| 7th Apr 2006 |
111 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
3 Beds,
1 Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£118,000 |
| See current value |
| 14th Mar 2006 |
115 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£118,500 |
| See current value | ||
| 27th Jan 2006 |
113 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£116,000 |
| See current value | ||
| 7th Nov 2003 |
107 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Freehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£74,950 |
| See current value | ||
| 19th Sep 2003 |
117 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£84,950 |
| See current value | ||
| 22nd Aug 2003 |
101 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£71,000 |
| See current value |
| 28th Feb 2003 |
99 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£59,000 |
| See current value | ||
| 5th Dec 2002 |
123 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£35,000 |
| See current value | ||
| 19th Jan 2001 |
81 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£44,000 |
| See current value | ||
| 31st Jan 2000 |
81 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£40,000 |
| See current value | ||
| 22nd Jan 1999 |
99 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£34,950 |
| See current value |
| 3rd Apr 1998 |
91 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£33,000 |
| See current value | ||
| 26th Aug 1997 |
95 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£34,950 |
| See current value | ||
| 29th Nov 1996 |
107 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Freehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£31,200 |
| See current value | ||
| 26th Jul 1996 |
109 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Freehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£43,000 |
| See current value | ||
| 29th Feb 1996 |
97 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£16,000 |
| See current value |
| 23rd Jun 1995 |
81 Foxholes Road, Rochdale OL12 0EF
Terraced,
Leasehold,
-- Beds,
-- Baths,
-- Receps
-
|
£37,000 |
| See current value |
Data on sold house prices, such as the results above for Foxholes Road Rochdale OL12, is supplied to us via monthly updates from the Land Registry for England and Wales and from the Registers of Scotland for Scotland. There may be a delay of up to 3 months from when a property is actually sold to when it becomes officially recorded with Land Registry and/or Registers of Scotland. We provide data on house prices for information only, on an 'as is' basis as supplied to us and accept no liability for any errors or omissions. If you have identified any incorrect information in, please Report an error.